SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (130607)4/30/2004 5:35:40 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (3) of 281500
 
Yesterday, or the day before, I ran across a factoid but did not make proper note of on my way past it, and now wish I had. Here it is, as best as I can recall it: between 1815 and 1914, approximately 85% of the world was colonized.

Now, that can't be true, can it? Maybe it was that 85% of the world was a colony or part of an empire, or either part of a colony or a colonizer.

At any rate, what's been picking at me about it is that the US actually had very few colonies. Puerto Rico, and the Philippines is about all -- there were and are some little islands like Guam, Virgin Islands, and Hawai'i.

The big colonial nations were Great Britain, Spain, France, Portugal, the Netherlands. Germany and Belgium had a few.

It seems to me that anti-Western sentiment is against the United States, not because of anti-colonialism, but because we are adamantly capitalistic, and the global elite, of both former colonies and former colonizers, is socialistic. How does that get transformed into anti-colonialism?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext