Booms, Busts, and Recoveries Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (49208)	5/1/2004 7:30:46 PM
From: Moominoid	Read Replies (1) of 74559

Yes of course they were in the atmosphere and the sun was dimmer so the temperature was lower than it would be (but still up to 10C warmer than today) if we stuck them all back in the atmosphere again. Of course some part was in the mantle, some in comets etc. and that in the mantle was added by volcanos to the atmosphere over time temporarily and then reburied in the crust... But what I don't get is why you want it hot and a high sea level again instead of controling things to be nice and mild. We can or will be able to control the system to avoid an ice age it seems. That's not the same as just releasing all the stored carbon which could turn us into a Venus clone in all likelihood.... So yes I agree with you in principle but disagree with your "policy" proposal. Can you explain why you want it so hot and wet? It doesn't sound good for people for a start....

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next