SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TigerPaw who wrote (9906)5/2/2004 9:22:01 AM
From: rrufff  Read Replies (1) of 20773
 
Seriously, you need to take a basic logic course.

The headline you wrote has nothing to do with the words that were quoted.

The PNAC is an easy target and that's fine. They wanted Saddam gone and they wanted to increase the US influence in the Mideast. I agree with all that, both that these were goals and that this was policy that probably would have garnered the support of most Americans. (They have become legitimate targets by emphasizing WMD's and failures in and utilization of so-called intelligence.

BUT GETTING BACK TO THE POINT OF OUR "DISCUSSION"

The headline you wrote and the thesis we have been discussing have absolutely zero evidentiary support from the passages you quote.

THERE IS NOT A SHRED OF EVIDENCE THAT ANYONE IN GOVERNMENT WANTED A NEW PEARL HARBOR, NOT A SHREAD OF EVIDENCE.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News