Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: one_less who wrote (44712)	5/3/2004 6:42:09 PM
From: sylvester80	Read Replies (1) of 89467

First of all, why are those Shiite insurgents called "terrorists" now under Bush but where innocent civilians under Saddam???? Secondly, putting some sentence in quotes does not make it a fact. Especially when it comes from a pinhead with no accountability. Even Bush said yesterday: "I was lying about Iraq but so what. I still enjoy seeing them being murdered.". See how that works? Hell!!! Every time there is a Bin Laden tape out, the CIA has to get the voice recording and try and figure out if it's him or some bozo. And your lies and source are from right wing bozos ready to spread what ever propaganda they want to advance their fascist goals. The FACT is that Iraq did have 2 civil wars and an 8 year Iran Iraq war. And the FACT is that Bush and his dumb@ss neoCONs and their supporters seem to NOT have read a single history book of the region. Or maybe they did but they decided to LIE about that too. The FACT is that the MESS that Bush finds himself in, including now the Shiite uprising AND the TORTURES in the Iraqi prisons is no different than what Saddam had to deal with to try and keep Iraq together as one country. Bush likes to call those insurgents, terrorists. Why are those Shiites terrorists now but where innocent people under Saddam???? I suggest you read the articles that I gave you and read about the ONLY SECULAR Arab country that Iraq was under Saddam (and for good reason as you can see now) and the freedoms that women had (read some of the articles posted here about how women's rights in Iraq are now WORSE than they were under Saddam), and the education ALL Iraqis were receiving BEFORE the 1st Gulf war away from religion and towards engineering, medicine, arts, literature, music etc... But you see, a strong, educated and rich Iraq does not play well with the powers that be that need cheap oil. And in order to get cheap oil you need their people to live in poverty, uneducated and in constant fighting so that we could make money supplying them weapons and taking their oil.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next