SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jttmab who wrote (131252)5/4/2004 12:41:20 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Fine, you've provided me with multiple definitions of what anarachy is, including one that says that the dictionary defintion is wrong. ... I'm sorry I was using the dictionary definition of anarchy. How stupid of me.

Not stupid.. ignorant (without knowledge)..

Anarchy is often mis-defined as chaos and confusion.. But that's because it is so utopian a concept that it really defies what we understand as common sense..

Because we, as human beings, have little capacity to visualize how a society without government could truly exist and guarantee the rights of all.

And you're right.. I also filter Anarchy as unachievable, because it will eventually be corrupted by human moral fraility and insecurity.

But you were stating that democracy had no relationship with Anarchy, and I merely provided you the ideological definition.

Btw, I also don't believe classical libertarianism (Lassez Faire capitalism) is viable either...

Basically all political and economic systems share the common denominator of exploitation and inequality to some extent.

As one of my poli-sci professors once taught me in asking what the difference between capitalism and communism is..

"With Capitalism, man exploits man.. With Communism, it's the other way around"..

Hawk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext