Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (42179)	5/4/2004 6:47:44 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) of 793759

But they are consistent in the sense that when violence is done by superior force that hits civilian areas--falujah, palestine, sudan, kosovo etc. their bias is toward the guys who take the hit. Its more a pacifist bias than anti-US, israel, sudan or serb, i think. With all the bravado spoken here and elsewhere it still shakes me up to see the consequences of advanced weaponry. I try not to look so i can be stalwart in this war, but not looking is not the answer either. We have reached a certain level of civilized behavior and it impairs our abilities to fight evil folks. Thats why the professional army. But thats also why the BBC and all the pacifist do-gooder opposition. I have to rethink things in terms of this moral dilemna. Can europe or the US win or even survive if we dont use many aspects of our military power against these thugs. Is there an alternate way? Hell, i dont think so. MIke

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next