SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jmhollen who wrote (572249)5/6/2004 4:22:58 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
<font color=brown>Bye Bye scummy rummy! ;~)<font color=black>

******************************************************

Democrats Calling for Rumsfeld's Ouster

Thu May 6, 1:09 PM ET

By SONYA ROSS, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - Democratic members of Congress began calling Thursday for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's resignation over the U.S. military's abuse of Iraqi prisoners, but the White House reaffirmed President Bush (news - web sites)'s support of the embattled Cabinet officer.




"If he does not resign forthwith, the president should fire him," Harkin said.

The top House Democrat indicated she, too, wanted Rumsfeld out. Asked if she thought Rumsfeld should quit, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., replied, "Yes, I do." She did not immediately elaborate.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., did not call for Rumsfeld's resignation but said the secretary and his deputy, Paul Wolfowitz, "bear ultimate responsibility for this catastrophe."

Harkin's statement came as White House spokesman Scott McClellan said Bush "absolutely" wants Rumsfeld to remain in office.

"The president very much appreciates the job Secretary Rumsfeld is doing and the president has great confidence in his leadership," said McClellan. The spokesman declined to characterize Bush's comments to Rumsfeld in a private conversation between the two men on Wednesday, though another Bush aide said the president had given his Cabinet officer a "mild rebuke."

Rumsfeld, scheduled to testify publicly before a Senate committee on Friday, abruptly canceled a scheduled speech in Philadelphia in order to prepare for the hearing, according to a Pentagon (news - web sites) official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Harkin, a critic of the administration's foreign policy, said in his statement that "the secretary must be held accountable" for abuses in military prisons. "The United States Constitution assures civilian control over the military. The blame cannot and should not remain solely with low-level soldiers," he said.

In a Thursday editorial, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch called for Rumsfeld to resign over the "botched handling" of the investigation into the prisoner abuse at Iraq (news - web sites)'s Abu Ghraib prison and over earlier Iraq war decisions. And, a column in The New York Times by Thomas L. Friedman called on President Bush to fire Rumsfeld "today, not tomorrow or next month."

Asked about the column, Republican Sen. John McCain told CBS' "The Early Show," "I don't presume to tell the president what he should do, but it's obvious that there's a lot of explaining that Secretary Rumsfeld and others have to do."

Reports of abusive treatment of Iraqi detainees, including Iraqis forced to submit to sexual humiliations, have sparked a torrent of criticism in Congress from lawmakers demanding that the administration investigate fully.

Several Republicans have expressed unhappiness in recent days that they were not informed of the abuses until they were disclosed publicly on CBS, which aired photographs as evidence.

White House aides, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that privately, Bush made it clear to Rumsfeld that he was displeased over not learning about the pictures of U.S. soldiers posing with hooded or naked Iraqi prisoners until the images aired on national television.

The president, in an interview Wednesday with the U.S.-sponsored Al-Hurra television network, expressed "confidence in the secretary of defense" and "confidence in the commanders on the ground in Iraq." He promised "people will be held to account" for the prisoner abuses.

Whether Rumsfeld will be one of those people remained unclear.

Rumsfeld himself has deflected questions about whether he should resign. But as the defense secretary prepared for Friday's congressional hearing on the prison abuses, the chorus of criticism gathered strength.



In its Thursday editions, the Post-Dispatch called for Rumsfeld's resignation not only because of the prisoner abuses but also because Rumsfeld "seriously underestimated" both the number of U.S. troops needed in the Iraq conflict and the threat from weapons of mass destruction posed by Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s government.

"It's the accumulation of all these miscalculations, misconceptions and missteps — and an arrogant inability to admit his mistakes — that require him to step down," the editorial said.

Rumsfeld was the architect of the Iraq war — and his department largely controlled the postwar occupation. As that occupation has become plagued by wide-ranging problems, including a stubborn insurgency, the criticism of him has grown. There were complaints that reconstruction contracts were not issued competitively and that there were too few U.S. soldiers on hand to secure the country.

But the complaints have crystallized now — especially among Democrats, but even among Republicans — over the pictures of prisoner abuse by U.S. forces, and whether the Pentagon informed Congress or the president soon enough about the growing investigations.

"The Congress ... has been kept completely in the dark," McCain said.

story.news.yahoo.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext