SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: BubbaFred who wrote (49628)5/7/2004 12:31:27 AM
From: Taikun  Read Replies (1) of 74559
 
BubbaFred, This is the second time you've posted this wrong assumption:

Mauldin writes: "Today, 10-year rates are 4.57%. Thus, if rates were "natural," we would be seeing a yield curve that was much flatter. That means we should be paying attention... for before the yield curve goes negative, it first becomes flat".

Pimco's Bill Gross puts the natural overnight rate at 2%. 457-200=257bp. This is not an unsteep or flat yield curve, it will merely reflect the fact that banks will lend less, because there will be less margin, and they will be more discriminating of borrowers. This is separate from the issues of a market crash. Besides, I give the Fed a 35% chance of a rate cut of 25bp to an overnight rate of 0.75% by Dec 05.

Mauldin's flat yield curve premise for a market crash is a weak argument. If this is a premise for inferring his argument, the premise is not infallible thus the argument is inconclusive.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext