Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: one_less who wrote (45326)	5/7/2004 9:38:48 AM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) of 89467

You seem to enjoy convoluting the statements and meanings conveyed by others more than actual discussion. I don't know how one can have a discussion in a written medium unless an effort is made to ensure that the written words accurately reflect the positions that are being discussed. That said, I think my analysis of Laz's post accurately reflected what he wrote and more importantly, it is my belief that it accurately reflected what he was thinking at the time. I also realize that posts on SI represent a snapshot of an idea, Rarely does more than 5 minutes of contemplation and editing go into a post (which is why the links tend to be so much more informative). The next post by the same author may well contradict the previous. All I did was examine that idea snapshot in slow motion, much like Neo examining incomming bullets while in the matrix. Sometimes one has to take the time to stop and closely examine where one is before continuing down the path. That makes it easier to focus on the concepts instead of the argument. TP

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next