SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Greg or e who wrote (17463)5/13/2004 9:05:49 AM
From: Solon  Read Replies (1) of 28931
 
"You should take your own advise"

I try to. Webster's makes it clear that "wickedness" is archaic "1 archaic : UNGODLINESS, WICKEDNESS."

This came from the intolerance of fanatics who ran the world for centuries of conflict and whom disallowed freedom of worship. So we are left with the plain fact that atheism is simply:

2 a : a disbelief in the existence of deity b : the doctrine that there is no deity"

No creed. No goals. No commandments. No desire to kill, to hurt, to overthrow, to create revolution, or to disrupt society.

"Stalin puts his "DOCTRINE" into action by doing whatever, to whomever he pleased. Practically; that resulted in millions of innocent deaths."

That was called "COMMUNISM", Greg. Of course you knew that and were simply trying to attach the lack of belief in God with a totalitarian ideology which DID have a creed and a goal of social revolution and the removal of freedom of worship. You did so because you do not want to argue fairly, but prefer to get some mileage out of fallaciousness.

As a point of interest, the murder of religious people was not even a Communist initiative as communism was intended. It was (as you said) a STALIN DOCTRINE. Stalin saw religion as a threat to his own fanaticism and Absolute power. And no fanatic can live in peace or comfort alongside of another fanatic. They always choose to annihilate one another. In case you do not read the papers...nothing has changed in that regard.

In my next post I will reference a paper which should educate you on the matter of atheism.

"Why not respond with reason instead of just saying everything is ridiculous or contemptible?"

As always, you ignore everything for which you have no response and you make a lame grunt just so as to get something on paper. Great NON-response to all the points, Greg! Try again!

Message 20124045
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News