SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (1829)5/13/2004 7:20:32 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (50) of 35834
 
Boston Globe publishes bogus GI rape pictures

Taken from pornographic website as first reported by WorldNetDaily

OPERATION: IRAQI FREEDOM
Posted: May 12, 2004
12:15 p.m. Eastern
By Sherrie Gossett
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
<font size=4>
Boston residents got more than they bargained for this morning when their copy of the Globe came complete with graphic photos depicting U.S. troops gang-raping Iraqi women.
<font size=5>
Problem is the photos are fake. They were taken from
pornographic websites and disseminated by anti-American
propagandists, as first reported by WND a week ago.
<font size=4>
WND contacted the Globe to question staff about the photos.

Asked whether the photos were the same as the porn photos WND already investigated, reporter Donovan Slack said, "I have no idea. I'm surprised the editor even decided we should write about it."

She added: "Oh my God, I'm scared to answer the phone today."

"It's insane," said Slack. "Can you imagine getting this
with your cup of coffee in the morning? Somehow it got
through all our checks. Our publisher's not having a very
good day today."


Slack sent the photos to WND, which immediately confirmed they were the same porn photos reported on last week.

Responding to an e-mail request from the Globe, WND furnished the true source of the photos, and walked Slack through the "Sex In War" site over the phone, so she could see the photos matched.

I'll take the 'Five days for $15' deal," Slack quipped, adding, "This is ridiculous. I'll be working at Penthouse soon."
<font size=5>
The photos accompanied an article about Boston city
councilor Chuck Turner, who distributed the graphic
photographs yesterday at a press conference with activist
Sadiki Kambon. Turner told reporters the photos showed
U.S. soldiers raping Iraqi women.

"The American people have a right and responsibility to
see the pictures," Turner said.
<font size=4>
Kambon, who is director of the Black Community Information Center, said at the news conference he received the photographs by e-mail from Akbar Muhammad, a representative for the Nation of Islam.

The Globe was provided with a statement by Muhammad who
wrote, "There aren't any doubts in my mind about the
reports on torture of Iraqi prisoners. All you have to do
is look at the pictures of Saddam Hussein after his
capture when he was being examined on television across
the world. He appeared to be drugged and unaware that he
was being filmed to be humiliated and disgraced in front
of the entire world."

As WND previously reported, the pornographic 'rape' images
were carried, among other venues, on the website for the
Committee for the Defense of Saddam Hussein.

In the letter given to the globe, Muhammad termed
reservists, "raving beasts," and added, "I was fortunate
enough to make copies of the pictures before they became
unavailable on the Internet."

The pictures are still on the porn site "Sex In War" and
appeared in several Arabic newspapers.

Muhammad also called for the resignation of Rumsfeld.

Turner and Kambon told the Globe they don't know where or when the photos they distributed yesterday were taken. But Turner said they came from a "very legitimate person."

"We cannot document their authenticity," he told reporters. "But you have the ability to do that."
<font size=5>
The Globe published the photos despite the fact a
skeptical Slack had raised serious doubts about them and
was not able to verify their authenticity. Slack was
assigned to report on the press conference and did not
approve of the photos being published. The photos were
approved for publication by three Boston Globe editors.
<font size=4>
In the article the Boston Globe ran with the photos, Slack underscored her skepticism: "The images, depicting men in camouflage uniforms having sex with unidentified women, bear no characteristics that would prove the men are U.S. soldiers or that the women are Iraqis. And there is nothing apparent in the images showing they were taken in Iraq. Unlike the photographs widely publicized last week, the images appear to have been taken outdoors in a sandy area with hills in the background."

A source with the Globe said the controversy already had reached the president of the New York Times, who reportedly is furious. The Boston Globe is owned by the New York Times Co.
<font size=5>
Turner said he and Kambon were distributing the photos to
force the Bush administration to release additional
documentation of abuses, which Turner said are not limited
to the prison, west of Baghdad.
<font size=4>
At the time of publication of this report, Turner and Kambon were not available for comment.
<font size=5>
So far, the Globe hasn't published a retraction. However,
as posted on the Free Republic website, a reader who wrote
the Globe's ombudsman, Christine Chinlund, received the
following e-mail reply:
<font size=4>
The Globe should not have run the photo. It appeared as the result of a miscommunication between photo staffers, and a collapse of the usual "checks and balances" system. In my next column I will provide a more detailed explanation of how this lamentable mistake happened.
Sincerely,

Chris Chinlund
Globe Ombud

Chinlund's response ended with the following P.S.: "Can you tell me which website is providing the copy for letters like yours? Thanks."
<font size=3>
worldnetdaily.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext