Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (132905)	5/13/2004 9:39:23 PM
From: Zeuspaul	Read Replies (3) of 281500

And what, exactly, was 9/11 It was not an attack by Iraq. The military objective in Iraq has in no way been clear. except a bloody and barbaric signal that Islamic militants have the United States squarely in their sights? If you want to defeat the Islamic Militants...take away their strengths. To date we have only made them stronger....we are going in the wrong direction. We are using the wrong weapons. Would we be in their sights if we were not on their lands? Why are we on their lands?? Could it be for the oil?? There are other sources of energy. Why haven't we engaged our full energies towards the development of alternate sources? How many solar cells does $100 billion buy? If you invest $100 billion in Fuel cells how much energy would you save? Is it politically easier to go to war with our youth than make the hard energy choices? What would be the political consequences to Bush if he were to utter the word conserve or the words alternate energy? Zeuspaul

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next