SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 166.05+0.6%Nov 19 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Techteam who wrote (3658)8/20/1997 9:55:00 PM
From: qdog   of 152472
 
So what is your position, Techteam? What is your field of expertise??

While manufactureres and operators argued the merits of CDMA vs. TDMA based technologies years ago, only QCOM continues to argue a substantial quality, feature or cost advantage of one versus the other. Sure operators and manufacturers that have committed to one or the other argue publicly but asked them privately or ask players such as Nortel that provide both and they concede little difference.

Really!! I have a BSEE and years of expierence, you know what I've learn in 25 years......prejudice!!! Go with what you know...don't upset the apple cart... Get the picture??

Are you weighing the facts and realities, or are you listening to the grumblings of engineers that aren't "comfortable about the change??" I know plenty of "chairborne" rangers that detest change. " Don't upset my routine crowd!!!" "Hey, I got to learn something new, individuals!!!!" I'll bet they exsist in the investment community!!!

You are an investment individual?? Let me ask you to reference your remarks about QCOM; from QCOM

Here is the deal, I don't care to see Wall Streets assessment, Motorola hype; Ericsson detractions.....what I care to see is QCOM's releases; OK??

BTW, Ericsson never said CDMA would not work but rather that CDMA would be late and would not meet the capacity or feature claims.

Really??? Hmmm!! Again, can you direct me to the appropriate information??
Allow us dumb and simple folks the right to evaulate for ourselves...GIVE US THE URL'S!! Caveat Emptor...I'm a professional in the industry, so be very careful about YOUR empirical data and source. <wink>

No CDMA system is working at 20-1 capacity gains and the systems have proven as difficult to engineer as any analog or TDMA based equivalent.

The difficult engineering has only begun, SPORT!! Address the data issue for me. Show me how GSM/TDMA is going to be SOOOOOO superior???? Ha, I'm sorry, I love this lastest barrage of gloom and doom. GSM is old hat, ancient and you are right sir, DIFFICULT TO ENGINEER!!!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext