SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TigerPaw who wrote (46769)5/20/2004 4:17:11 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) of 89467
 
I have several times now. It was a response to your post in which YOU stated the ONLY ...CHOICE... was in the hands of the US military.

You were wrong.

Fault, blame and such is what you and your buddies do here. GWB is at fault and to blame for everything according to you. There is nothing more or less in the context of all your posts put together.

Well, that line of reasoning works if you live in an egg shell. Maybe that would be a better thread header for this site. The left wing extremist egg.

But out here in the real world things are a whole lot more complex. T'was not me who laid blame it was you. We may find out someday that there actually was some corruption that was at fault.

It may be that something else was going on besides a wedding. It may be that it was only a traditional wedding. It may be that some dumb skin head in the military just wanted some notches in his gun. It may be that the military followed standard procedure...we don't know.

However, at the time of the incident the only information available to soldiers in the battle zone was that there were AK-47s fired and their position was to return fire when under fire. At a minimum, misunderstandings occured. Far from blaming children and such ... I am extending the benefit of doubt to all sides.

Would I advise suspending the shooting of guns at weddings in this region???? Duh, yes. Does that violate something in your ethics? Probably only if you can spin it to advance your REAL agendas, if that even qualifies as ethics.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News