Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Poet who wrote (46843)	5/21/2004 10:08:24 AM
From: Crocodile	Read Replies (1) of 89467

I never watched the video, but as someone who does quite a bit of work with DVcams and video footage, I find it interesting about the "poor quality" of the footage. To be absolutely frank about this, you have to have extremely old equipment, or have totally screwed around with the default settings on a camcorder to have it shoot "poor quality" footage. It's almost impossible to do unless you're trying to shoot in absolute dark. Believe me, I've shot video at outdoor winter carnivals with no extra lighting on a -20F night and the footage comes out crisp and easy to see -- and that's with a pretty damned cheap DVcam that I use for such purposes. I don't buy the "poor quality" line at all. If it was poor quality, IMO, that was intentional to make it less easy to figure out that there was something "faked" about the content. At this time, I have no opinion on who is behind the video, but I do think there's something very fishy about the entire "poor quality" issue. Basically, I expect that the tape was "made" that way with the intent to deceive.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next