Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: bentway who wrote (24579)	5/22/2004 9:41:31 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) of 81568

An acceptable definition of rich is having a liquid net worth of $10,000,000 or earnings of $700,000 per year for the last 5 years with a net worth of over $7,000,000. Take the $200,000 and follow the tax tables, minus expenses, and in no way does $200,000 suggest rich. It is not much money today. The tax advocates are being disingeuous with the term rich because it polarizes the majority into sticking it to another group besides themselves...but to suggest that $200,000 is rich and then to compare it to the truly wealthy, it is neither right nor fair. It is no different than selling tax increases by calling them roll backs. Washington is very good at spins...they do it for a reason.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next