<It is YOU who is the liar because Hersh only reported that the US and Israel has contingency plans to neutralize Pakistan's nuclear capability. Hersh never included India in that alliance.>
Hersh makes outrageous claims and lies but whose hypothesis was this anyway let’s go back...fiction and figment of small mind..
<I also said that it is entirely conceivable that Israel would be a partner in such an enterprise. All of this was part of what Hersh alleged. I speculated that India could also be coopted if it came to this. It would not be in India's interests to have a nuclear fundamentalist Islamic regime as its neighbor and especially one that has fought several wars with India - but India, like Israel, will take its lead from the US.>
Fact as emerged in 24 hours..Brajesh Mishra,s doctrine of developing a “triad” or a “core alliance” of India, Israel and the United Stats for evolving a joint strategy in war on international terrorism) in the dust bin.
Than may be the ‘non entity coward’ is liar along with his mentor or his theories are like wishful thinking once core triad theory is thrown in dustbin...look at his words few days ago..
< <would venture to say that I know more about your part of the world than you do about the political and cultural dynamics as it pertains to the US.>
This much he knew about my part of the world that the thing he was theorising was thrown first thing from the options of new government. He knows nothing about my part of the world, your whole convenience analogy is based on pre- 911 scenarios, it was USA who had to give every conceivable concession to get Pakis on board, even today Pakis and Indians are two states with declared nuke programmes receiving billion dollar a year for being nice kids on the block, this is not convenience this is swallowing hard ball realism, and it is hard for you and remember it that USA would need these countries post 911, you know what Pakis got out of Afghan war, I think that war was a front to go through their entire nuke programmes, if you think that USA used Pakis until Afghan war don’t forget that someone took your entire leadership on a ride by the time the war was over Pak was a nuclear power, much as I disagree to that the fact remains the in politics Pakistan and US have used and utilised each other.
When the third world stone age draconian methods bring down first world economy on kneels the third world hinterlands need to be allied; Period. If Pakistan fools around and act like Saddam or try to rape a nation like Bangladesh again we should suffer the same fate as Iraq, we should know how to live in this world as a respectable nation.
Post 911 scenario is built on new strategy that of inclusion of ex- rogue states as principal partners in getting chopped these sordid Alqaeda tentacles, Saudis and Pakistanis matter in this whole equation know it well, and this is the reason that Bush administration has sown this alliance that has crippled Alqaeda. If Pakistan would have been treated like Iraq I think the mess in north of India would have crippled the region of South Asia, we are numbers and 1.5 billion people live there, India realises it, they are not going to listen to Israel to destroy Pakistan, your whole theory is cooked up in your mind and has no relevance.. |
