SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill who wrote (134038)5/23/2004 9:05:45 AM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
>> He's a hero because he spent over a year sweating, breathing sand and eating powder to protect people like you from the savages you support.
<<

It seems to me that is no longer on the list of reasons the administration gives for invading and occupying Iraq.

That reason was abandoned when the chief US weapons inspector, David Kay, finally and very reluctantly, concluded there we no stock piles of weapons. And Colin Powell, two weeks ago, admitted that the allegations made by him on behalf of the US in the UNSC were based on "deliberately false intelligence".

So I'm wondering why you cling to this notion even though it has been disowned by the people who originated it.

Your answer is very important. It is the key to understanding how this administration still receives 42% approval. I am wondering if these 42% are just beyond reach of facts and logic. Or whether more facts will finally persuade them they are following a leader who was easily duped.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News