Booms, Busts, and Recoveries Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Seeker of Truth who wrote (50390)	5/24/2004 1:25:08 PM
From: Elroy Jetson	Read Replies (2) of 74559

In large electrical generating plants, what advantage can there be in removing non-carbon components of coal before burning when they're so easily removed after-burning through emissions recovery currently used? You end up recycling the same sulfide compounds and fly ash etc. It seems to me to be the same process but more efficient. Why bother going to the expense of preprocessing? The largest portion of electricity, generated by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, is driven by coal. The plants are in Utah, Nevada and Arizona closer to the coal mines. But the emissions recovery is extensive.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next