SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (46824)5/25/2004 2:30:47 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) of 793964
 
The first question is, "were the prisoners at the Iraqi prison subject to the Geneva Convention?" From the looks of things, they were "armed combatants," not in uniform.

Two quick answers, Bill. The first is that you will have to argue with Rumsfeld, Myers, Wolfowitz, et al on this point. They all testified, unambiguously, that the Geneva Conventions applied in Iraq. Their argument in Guantanamo and Afghanistan depended on the non-state character of Al Q and, possibly, the Taliban. They all agreed it did not apply in Iraq. Second quick answer is the undisputed report of the ICRC that somewhere between 70 and 90% of those held were innocents are, at best, minor thieves.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext