Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (134468)	5/26/2004 4:05:09 PM
From: Sig	Read Replies (1) of 281500

<<It might be fun to conduct a nuclear bomb attack on the USA, but strategically, it would not achieve the goal of getting them out of Saudi Arabia, Israel etc and retreating to the USA. It would cause the USA to go bananas. It would be a big mistake.>> My guess is that something bad would then happen elsewhere. Unilaterally if need be, because there would be no time for UN debates before trying to prevent the next cities destruction. That is what we have tried to prove to nations leaders via Afghanistan and Iraq. And if we have convinced them , and stay the course, then terrorists will be most unwelcome in those lands. However, beyond the general threats, our specific plans should not be made public because the enemy could employ deceit and trickery to deflect our response. And perhaps cause harm to a friendly country. THe UN must now review their operation and have ideas on the table for various eventualities, because most of their past work will have been in vain if we get into nuclear exchanges. And I think you have already said that they need changes. Sig

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next