The Castle Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Castle

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (3401)	5/26/2004 8:39:28 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) of 7936

I repeat that if there is any validity to global dimming, and they do have measurements showing the earth receiving less sunlight, then its more likely that global warming is real and that the warnings have not been "consistently pessimistic". According to your own article the theory is not widely accepted. Also if global dimming happens it serves to counteract global warming makeing warming less severe not worse. That's exactly my point........it would appear that global dimming has kept temps from rising faster than they already have assuming there is validity to the theory. If it weren't for global dimming, things could be much worse. No one has said a "huge %tage".......that's your interpretation. Many people have talked about the huge cost of Kyoto, and if the global warming alarmists theories are true Kyoto would not be enough so the cost would even be larger. Yes you can spread the cost over billions of people but it so big that it will have a painful impact even then. Again, it doesn't have to be done in one year. Besides, I have faith in our ability to pull it off without derailing the world economy. ted

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next