My son's math MA and PhD were, I'll wager, at better Universities than the one you attended, unless you can beat UCSD and UC Berkeley.
Hah! It is precisely as I thought. I had especially Berkeley in mind. Fairyland University, once decent, now infested with mediocrity and fairies.
The advocacy by a non-pacifist who supports the death penalty of state-enforced gestation of zygotes on America women makes you a caricature of hypocrisy and delusion.
Redefining innocent humans into non-humanity is precisely what Hitler did to the Jews. You may call the unborn human a "zygote" until you drop dead. The objective fact is that all humans were once human zygotes just as all humans were once infants. That objectively places the human zygote on the exact same continuum that encompasses all of humanity. You murder it without any natural right at all. And that is quite fine by me, since you so obviously hunger for the right to these murders, disqualifying your authority to judge excellence. The issue for me is that you not only have no right to these murders, but you have no right to force me to pay for them in any way through public funding. Murder if you must, but on your own damned (and it is damned) dime.
Did I mention Dickens?
Inexplicably, which is typical of morally twisted leftists.
I don't spend as much time as you do in the contemplation of what my neighbor may be doing with his penis.
No, I suspect you spend a lot more time than I do on this abomination, since you actually champion forcing my public support of this moral filth, while I am content to let Sodomites do their dirty deeds in private, without forcing public support.
The thought of your "sticking your penis into" any other person's body--vagina, hands and/or mouth or whatever--however indicative of "moral excellence" you feel your "stickings in" are, as opposed to the "sticking in" preferences of another, is none too appealing, actually
Well obviously this would not be too appealing to you. After all, you actually elevate sodomite marriage to the level of heterosexuality, despite the objective fact that no human in all of human existence is rooted in sodomitic filth. It is to be expected that those whose ethical moorings are twisted would be repulsed by the only sexual relationship that objectively reflects humanity.
so I'll thank you to keep graphic references to genitals and by implication how you don't or do use yours out of this discussion.
It is just the plain truth of what you support, madam. I simply describe the filth that many wish to avoid, the hellish filth you are trying to force on the nation by law.
I have to go, so you get the last word. Blather on, Dombey.
You don't have to go, madam. You simply sense the futility of defending your filth against one who can articulate its filthiness. |
