Sorry to freak you out by deciding to have lunch at home instead of out. You sure do react strongly to minor changes of plan.
You claimed you had to go, that I'd have the last word. I knew it was a lie the minute I heard it.
I am wondering what your money-related rectum concerns are, specifically?
The mainstreaming of homosexuality will effect everything from laws on employment, to real estate to insurance and beyond. I wish not to be forced into any of the false changes that this filth will cause.
And what is your position on oral sex? Also unappealing to you, and thus evil?
Of course this has nothing to do with any of my concerns, which are most valid. No one is trying to force laws to access public resources based purely on the fact of oral sex (duh).
Have you divorced your wife yet, now that the laws require you to marry a person of the same gender? I'd like to urge you not to marry anyone unless you love him.
Well, if you'd like to urge this, go right ahead. I'm not interested in stopping your being an immoral twit. My concern lies only in your attempts to force my support of pure sodomitic filth by public law. Should you fail to do this, you will hear nothing from me.
A penis and rectum do not a marriage make, however much your imagination dwells on that particular image.
Yet ungodly leftists across the country are claiming that when the penis and rectum exist within homo-marriage, it is legitimate and worthy of support by the might of law. That is false.
Stop thinking about other men's rectums and penises this minute!
When you stop trying to force this abomination on me by law, then I assure you I will stop thinking about it. It will mean absolutely nothing to me.
Maybe if you looked out the window or read a good book it would help? Try Martin Chuzzlewit, by Charles Dickens. Use self discipline. Try some new subjects...
Maybe if you would try to get some decency for a change, you would see the crime you are committing against human nature.
What do you think about Abu Ghraib? What do you think of the ways the guy you're going to vote for pronounces it?!
Just like an empty-headed leftist to vote of such things as hairstyles and accents. No wonder Democrats spend so much on this sort of crap.
Do you think all American women should be forced by the state to gestate zygotes and fetuses to term, even those unwilling ones who would choose abortion?
I think if they absolutely must murder their own children, they should do it with their own money. Not one penny of public money should do toward helping anyone or any organization that would murder children. It is wrong to force me to support that which is against human identity.
How about the morning after pill? Is that child-murder?
The morning after pill is just a pill. So obviously it is not child-murder.
How about conceptions from rape? Forced gestation?
If the woman just has to murder a child that results of rape, she should do it without any public funding. the innocent humans loses no value merely because of the circumstances in which they are created. It is self-evident that they are all created equal and endowed by the Creator with the right to life and freedom to pursue happiness.
What if the rape victim is 12 years old? Still forced gestation?
Rape itself is the atrocity. The circumstances are horrific whether or not they result in a child. Murdering a child in these circumstances will not alter that fact. Whether the child lives or dies, extraordinary horror will exist. If he child is murdered via abortion, there is horror. If the child lives there is horror merely because of the rape. But if the 12 year-old just has to murder a child that results of rape, she should do it without any public funding. Innocent humans lose no value merely because of the circumstances in which they are created. It is self-evident that they are all created equal and endowed by the Creator with the right to life and freedom to pursue happiness.
Instruct us in humanitarianism. I love it when you do that.
It is human to allow self-actualizing humans their natural right to live and validly express themselves to the fullest extent nature allows. It is inhumane to define them away and then murder them simply because we perceive them as an inconvience. |
