You claimed you had to go, that I'd have the last word. I knew it was a lie the minute I heard it.
Oh, poor baby! I'm so sorry! Well, maybe I'll let you have the last word this time. Or maybe not. No promises now, so don't go getting your heart all set on it again.
The mainstreaming of homosexuality will effect everything from laws on employment, to real estate to insurance and beyond. I wish not to be forced into any of the false changes that this filth will cause.
If there are changes, they won't be false changes. And I don't believe that because you are all hung up on other people's "penises and rectums," unemployment and real estate laws should reflect your negative interest in this aspect of other citizens' lives.
My concern lies only in your attempts to force my support of pure sodomitic filth by public law. Should you fail to do this, you will hear nothing from me.
But I like to hear from you, so I think that although I've been remiss in attempting to force you to support sodomic filth, I must try to think of a way to do this in my spare time.
Of course this has nothing to do with any of my concerns, which are most valid. No one is trying to force laws to access public resources based purely on the fact of oral sex (duh).
Most homosexual females and some homosexual males engage in oral but not anal sex. Are you willing to let them marry whom they want to if they promise not to do that thing you just can't stand to think about and think about and think about and think about? Can non-rectal gay couples marry?
Hey, how about this--Should hetero couples who engage in anal sex have their marriages annulled by the state? Their insurance revoked? Not be able to file taxes jointly?
Yet ungodly leftists across the country are claiming that when the penis and rectum exist within homo-marriage, it is legitimate and worthy of support by the might of law. That is false.
Yes, it is false. They aren't claiming anything about "the penis and rectum" being "worthy of support." They're talking about their choice of life-partners being up to them, not up to you, and that they have the rights other citizens do in this regard. You are the only person I've ever heard talking so fixately about penises and rectums. I told you to stop that at once, too, naughty boy.
Maybe if you would try to get some decency for a change, you would see the crime you are committing against human nature.
You didn't specify my crime, and I can't figure it out. Which statute is it i've violated? It sure isn't the First Amendment.
The morning after pill is just a pill. So obviously it is not child-murder.
Wow. You aren't an extremist after all (except about what others do with their penises). There are those non pacifist, death penalty advocating forced-gestationists who do actually believe the morning after pill is murder because a zygote, like an embryo, like a fetus, if left unaborted by nature (most are) and intentionally aborted with the morning after pill, would in nine months come to term. Congratulations on being less nutty than I thought you were.
"Stop thinking about other men's rectums and penises this minute!"
When you stop trying to force this abomination on me by law, then I assure you I will stop thinking about it. It will mean absolutely nothing to me.
I swear to you, I will never force you to do anything sexually you don't want to. Or to refrain from doing anything you want (with a consenting adult, of course), either. Not to worry.
An interesting thing in that post of yours is your conviction that citizens should not have to pay taxes in support of services or actions or even simply institutions of which they morally disapprove.
Is this exemption a right you would accord also to me, and others who hold other institutions or actions to be immoral?
This is an old question. I'm curious as to your point of view. Actually, what I'm curious about his how you will craft a rationalization for you getting to decide what policies unwilling tax dollars shouldn't support and what they should so that it turns out you support what you approve but i support, well, what you approve, too. |
