SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Lundin Petroleum LUPE Sweden

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tomas who wrote (538)5/31/2004 10:24:21 AM
From: Tomas  Read Replies (1) of 646
 
Market has become long-term bullish on 'commodity with cachet'
Oil & Gas Investor, May 2004 issue
By Brian A Toal

Consensus 2004 oil-price expectations have risen 25% during the past year and by 13% in first quarter 2004 alone - much greater rates of increase than were forecast for natural gas prices in both periods. all this is prompting a more bullish analyst stance on oil than has been witnessed in recent decades.

"Oil has suddenly become the commodity with cachet," says Shannon Nome, E&P analyst with JP Morgan securities in Houston. Indeed, the JP Morgan view calling for average $31-per-barrel oil prices this year remains well above recent consensus estimates by a margin of roughly $2.50.

Not only that, the market-maker believes that crude prices will actually gain support from seasonality in the second quarter.

"There is a widespread perception that the seasonal decline in global oil demand from the first to second quarter pressures crude prices," she observes. "However, evidence points to the opposite price trend typically occurring in the spring, as refiners gear up to build gasoline stocks ahead of the summer driving season."

While the analyst's crude-price outlook does call for a seasonal moderation from very high first-quarter 2004 levels, she expects that decline to be only slight versus consensus estimates.

"Our forecast from second-quarter through fourth-quarter 2004 is a flat $30 - well supported by recently low crude and gasoline inventories."

Naturally, there are risks to Nome's oil-price outlook. However, unless OPEC overproduces by 1 million barrels per day or more relative to its new 23.5 million barrel-per-day quota, she doesn't foresee an excessive second-quarter global inventory build.

Such a robust outlook for crude would seem to auger well for oil-weighted equities. But the fact is, most oil-sensitive E&P stocks under Nome's coverage have actually performed only in line with their gas-sensitive cousins. During first-quarter 2004, both equity groups were up an average 14% versus a 4% move in the S&P 500.

"This could present an interesting investment opportunity if oil prices continue to surprise to the upside, as we expect," she says.

Also, the analyst notes that E&P companies are modestly less hedged on the oil side, "so they could feasibly participate to a greater extent in any potential upside surprise in crude oil prices."

No less bullish about future oil prices is J. Marshall Adkins, managing director of energy research for Raymond James & Associates in Houston. he notes that many clients have jokingly referred to the firm's energy group as "perma-bulls" that have never met an energy-price forecast that was too high.

This perception, however, doesn't mesh with reality, the anaIyst contends. "The facts show that our bullish oil-price forecasts, at least in the past two years, have actually proven to be consistently low," says Adkins. "In an effort to rectify this overly bearish track record, we are raising our 2004 oil-price forecast from $31 per barrel to $34.36 and our 2005 forecast from $32 per barrel to $33."

Likewise, the Raymond James energy group is boosting its 2004 U.S. natural gas-price forecast from $5.40 per Mcf to $5.92 and its 2005 forecast from $5.75 to $6.

One of the major reasons the team has upwardly revised its 2004 and 2005 oil-price forecasts is that it sees a growing disconnect between the IEA global supply/demand data and global oil inventories.

"It now appears that IEA concerns about second-quarter inventory builds were somewhat exaggerated," says Adkins. "We believe the IEA is simply underestimating global demand and overestimating oil supplies. Eventually, the facts will support our view that a strong global economic recovery, combined with a slowing in non-OPEC oil-production growth, is driving a much tighter global oil market than anticipated."

Going forward, the analyst expects natural gas prices to be much more closely linked with oil prices than in the past decade, with a 5.5-to-l oil/gas price ratio. Thus, he looks for natural gas prices to average just below $6 this year and right at $6 in 2005.

Even though its 2004 oil-price forecast is more than $6 ahead of Street consensus, it is actually $1 below the futures market for 2004, says Adkins.

"If we're right [about our oil-price forecasts], E&P companies' earnings are likely to be much higher than current consensus estimates and, likewise, E&P cash flows and capital expenditures on drilling are also likely to be much higher than consensus estimates."

Adds Adkins, "Higher spending and price realizations will likely result in higher E&P stock-price evaluations and higher oilfield-service company evaluations during the coming years."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext