Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TigerPaw who wrote (17573)	5/31/2004 8:19:50 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (4) of 28931

"I'm not aware of any educated person who maintains that plants and animals didn't evolve.." Of course when anyone says anything against the theory of evolution, the the fallacy of equivocation kicks in and there is a subtle change in the meaning of the word evolution. Pointing to plant breeding as proof of life evolving from non living matter is hardly compelling argumentation. "Molecular biologist and medical doctor Michael Denton concludes, "Ultimately the Darwinian theory of evolution is no more nor less than the great cosmogenic myth of the twentieth century."". Denton is obviously not denying that change within species happens. What many well educated people are questioning is the evolutionary claims to bio-genesis and spontaneous generation of the universe out of nothing, by nothing, and for nothing, as a means to deny the need for a Creator.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next