Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: quehubo who wrote (135001)	6/1/2004 5:29:18 PM
From: cnyndwllr	Read Replies (3) of 281500

Mr. Tillman accomplished what he wanted, he wanted to serve his country. It is not uncommon for people in the military to die from unfortunate accidents such as friendly fire. I think that's a noble motivation. But why, in a mistaken, "friendly" firefight between two American units, did the Army press officers deem it necessary to "make him a hero" and award him a silver star, all the while putting forth the story that he died charging up the hill toward Afghan ambushers? I guess the U.S. army thinks it needs a little more fervor than normal to get the average U.S. youngster to submit a few years of his life to the whims of a government run by men from families that seem to lack the "patriotism" that motivated you. Or am I wrong that the war wimps kids don't serve, and for sure don't serve in positions that leave them the most likely to get killed? I'll buy into your "sense of duty and honor to serve their country as Congress and/or the President sees fit" when I start seeing the children of the President and the Congress enlist. Until then I'll think that it's a matter of generally poor people looking for a way out of a dismal life who are enlisting and hoping to learn skills, see the world and make a grubstake for their life after service. By the way, aren't you mixing metaphors when you say; "Oil consuming nations wont be held hostage to the attacks of Islamofascists? Will we suffer "tremendous bloodshed" because of oil, or is it because of attacks? Or maybe we should consider any use of THEIR natural oil resources that doesn't fit our prosperity plan as an "attack?" And even if you're right, how you gonna "hunt down and exterminate" Islamofascists? Will you make them wear stars of David on their sleeves or do you think they'll just announce their allegiances so you can kill them. Or maybe you want to kill anyone that LOOKS like they could be an Islamofascist. That's one 5-paragraph post of yours that seems long on emotion and short on logic on three points. I'm reminded of an old saying; "Just cause you say it don't mean it's true."

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next