SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (27519)6/1/2004 11:01:47 PM
From: zonkieRead Replies (1) of 81568
 
Brumar verses Bush round one.

Brumar says he has qualms, questions nominating an alcoholic who also may be a past cocaine user. Finishes junior off by saying he probably isn't the best qualified for the job.
________________________________

To: MKTBUZZ who wrote (1) 6/14/1999 12:05:00 AM
From: Brumar89 View Replies (1) | Respond to of 556057

Guess this a forum where folks can voice their opinions about Bush's candidacy, so here are mine.

GWB is likely to get the nomination and could win. While I'm not a strong opponent of his candidacy, I have a few qualms.

Background issue #1: After all the hullaboo about Clinton's moral problems and the skeletons in his closet, should we really choose as a followup an alcoholic and a possible past cocaine user? (Note I said possible. I think he has not denied the rumors so far(?).) Also I hope there are no Paula Jones/Dolly Browning type characters out there with stories about what may or may not have happened during some past partying.

Background issue #2: I wish that a lot of his personal funds hadn't come from "corporate welfare" in the form a taxpayer funded stadium.

Issue #3: Is he the best qualified candidate? Probably not.
dev.siliconinvestor.com;

Brumar knocks him out in the first!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext