EDTA (was GIFT) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : EDTA (was GIFT)

EDTA 0.000200

+300.1%

Mar 7 3:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: GRC who wrote (1237)	8/21/1997 11:55:00 AM
From: Gregory Snowdon	of 2383

GRC, First of all, thanks for the updates. Strictly from a laymans point of view it sounds like we have a good case for the following reason. As you said, CS is not disputing what they do but rather the patent itself. But I'm looking along these same lines one step further based on what you've put together. CS is not arguing that the patent is wrong or that it doesn't cover what they do because its wrong, they are arguing that certain meanings of words within the patent have alternate meanings. To me, this sounds like a real stretch. i.e confuse the facts when there is no case. Please correct me if I'm interpreting this incorrectly. Greg

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next