Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (48749)	6/4/2004 8:27:11 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) of 793914

LOL! Your recollection of events & reality are clearly at odds with each other. The nuance issue had to do with folks grossly abusing the word nuance when revisionist history, blatant distortion, lies & deceit would be the appropriate words. That is a fact. And even if you fervently believed, albeit inappropriately, that I eschewed the meaning of one word, you still made a huge leap of faith to conclude that I "don't care about dictionary definitions". As for the personal attacks, when you make false assertions about me like, <font color=blue>"It was careless of me to not recognize that someone who doesn't care about dictionary definitions would also not care about language adapted by political writers to describe current events."....<font color=black> or when you make similar false assertions about foks on this thread like, <font color=blue>"true believers".... audacious/hypocritical media bashers.... folks getting excercised, spewing stereotypes, ET AL,<font color=black> they are personal attacks. You may believe with all your heart that those things are true (they aren't), you are still attacking folks on a personal basis. It's that simple.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next