Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: michael97123 who wrote (49849)	6/10/2004 11:32:29 AM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (2) of 793928

After all your protestations to the contrary you sort of made an anti-reagan comment yesterday but someone caught you on it. I'm sticking to my "no serious analysis of Reagan this week" guns. As I recall the comment you are talking about was in the context of the Bush lawyers arguing that the president was above the law. I referred to both Watergate and Iran Contra. That's not, in any sense, an analysis of Reagan's presidency. Different topic. As for whether Bush's polling numbers get a pop from the Reagan stuff, I don't really have an opinion. It's certainly clear that the Bush people are hyping it for all its worth. And then some. I wouldn't be surprised if they over do it. It's their mantra. I don't plan to "move in for a kill" on Reagan. Most likely won't do anything since we'll all be moving on to other topics of which there are more than enough. But I will feel free to do some analysis, should the opportunity offer itself. In case you are interested, however, here's a serious Reagan piece by Sid Blumenthal. Don't tell anyone I snuck it to you. Drudge is advertising it. guardian.co.uk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next