Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Win Smith who wrote (136174)	6/10/2004 4:10:44 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) of 281500

You just don't get it... The onus for providing evidence of Iraq's disarmament rested upon Saddam's shoulders, not the rest of the world (including the CIA). There was a 15-0 vote in the UNSC that unanimously concurred that Saddam's government was in "Material Breach" of its disarment accords based upon the lack of supporting documentation and credible evidence to account for all of his WMDs. There was also a 175 page UNMOVIC report released days before the war began that outlined all the areas in which Iraq was not in compliance. Shoot.. we lacked strong, conclusive evidence for both positions related to the possession of WMD stockpiles and continuing research. To date we have not discovered the stockpiles. However, David Kay DID discover evidence of the continuance of BANNED WMD research. This was supposed to be an inspection, not an investigation.. Nor should it have EVER required any intelligence agency to be required to speculate as to whether Saddam had WMDs or not. Saddam was supposed to provide the evidence, or cooperate FULLY with inspection teams attempting to resolve the decrepancies. He did neither. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next