SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Selectric II who wrote (8912)6/14/2004 3:24:26 PM
From: Orcastraiter  Read Replies (4) of 90947
 
That's where your observations and "analysis," if you can call it that, fall short. Clinton didn't give a rat's ass about Gore; only about himself and his legacy. Clinton wanted his presidency to be the high water mark.

So Clinton sewed the seas with time bombs...even if Al Gore became president. That's an interesting notion that you have absolutely zero proof of. This again reiterates the proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are incapable of rational and critical thinking.

Btw, if more than half the country is so in love with Gore, why isn't he the democrat nominee this time?

Four years passed. If you think that politics is static, and that the electorate doesn't change it's mind from time to time, then you have forgotten the lesson of what "read my lips" did to the last Bush presidency.

And if Gore thought Lieberman would be his best VP in 2000, why did Gore endorse Dean, not even bothering to give Lieberman a heads-up?

Well like I said above, politics is not static...it's a complicated dynamic situation. I suppose that Gore endorsed Dean because he was the front runner in the primary...and Lieberman was pulling up the rear with the Reverend Sharpton. Further I suspect that Gore shared in the belief with Dean that the war in Iraq was a huge mistake. Lieberman on the otherhand was a supporter of the war.

Here I'm stating the obvious for you, proving once again that you are incapable of rational and critical thinking.

I'm much more inclined to cut to the chase and call you a moron, Orky.

Which proves again my statement about your tendency to rebut in a one liner that usually includes name calling.

LOL,

Orca
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News