IDT *(idtc) following this new issue?* Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IDT *(idtc) following this new issue?*

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: carreraspyder	6/14/2004 4:24:26 PM
	of 30916

Court Won't Save Phone Competition Rules By GINA HOLLAND, Associated Press Writer WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court refused Monday to intervene and temporarily save phone competition regulations that force regional carriers to share their networks with competitors at deep discounts. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist declined to grant a stay sought by AT&T Corp., MCI Inc. and state utility regulators. The decision means that government rules intended to make local phone service more competitive will expire on Tuesday. The rules had been thrown out by an appeals court, and the Bush administration decided not to ask the Supreme Court to review that decision. The head of the Federal Communications Commission said last week that work was beginning on new rules. Consumer groups and the long-distance carriers have said prices for millions of phone customers are likely to go up when the rules expire. But FCC (news - web sites) Chairman Michael Powell has disputed that, saying he believes "people sort of exaggerate what happens." The FCC rules allowed states to require that the regional carriers — Verizon, BellSouth, Qwest and SBC — lease parts of their networks at low prices to long-distance companies in an effort to boost competition. In March, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said the government didn't justify a need for the rules. Despite the administration's decision to drop the case, others unsatisfied with the ruling decided to go to the Supreme Court. The attorney for the state of California, Michigan utility regulators and a national association of regulators told Rehnquist in an emergency appeal filed last Thursday that the ruling prevents states from helping bring competition to local telephone service. The decision "jeopardizes the local telecommunications competition that has developed over the last decade," Washington lawyer James Bradford Ramsay wrote. The Supreme Court will announce later this year whether it will hear the broader appeal. The government's decision not to request the action makes high court review less likely.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next