re: Regarding ban from moderated Gorilla thread.
Uncle Frank,
I started out with a perfectly non contentious, issue only post to Buckley #reply-20217791. Buckley responded to my post in a contentious manner in a post to Rkal stating that I conveniently took his statements out of context and that I do this on a frequent basis. You didn't notice that as contentious, UF? Imo, you are being extremely one sided. Buckley says something contentious, I responded with something that is a stretch to term as contentious imo (using the word "promote"), and you ban me.
As far as the word "promote", used in my second post, do we really need to have an argument as to what it means? Buckley liked the company and the stock alot, Ok? In this post, Buckley puts a $949 price target on Sebl #reply-14486132 by year 2009--- (of course you have to take the price at the time and do the math). Do you really want me to dig up more posts? The word "promote" doesn't mean I think the person doesn't believe what he is saying, in my mind it simply means the person gave a lot of reasons over time why he thought a certain company may be a good company and a good investment. And in my mind it was relevant mentioning SEBL, because I wanted to give an example of a company that might look OK on a Buckley free cash flow or a free cash flow per share basis from time to time, but that imo, has no real free cash flow from operations. This is the issue that we were discussing.
So are you going to be a man and live by your word and reinstate me, or are you going to prove yourself to be a lesser man than I thought?
Huey |
