SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Orcastraiter who wrote (8955)6/15/2004 3:15:57 PM
From: mph  Read Replies (3) of 90947
 
I'm not convinced that Gore necessarily moved from the center. I suspect he just became more
upfront about his actual POV.

As for Gore's motivations, I think he was more driven by
his personal need to reclaim center stage than being
off-put by Bush. I regarded the Dean endorsement as a
grandstand play for attention and an attempted power grab within the Democratic party.

Gore's actions since 2000 have been animated by emotionalism
and this was no different, imo.

And yes, we agree, Gore was and is a loser.

The fact that his fellow Dems did not get behind him
in a draft movement this time suggests to me that all
the extraordinary angst displayed by his supporters
after the events in 2000 was just a bunch of smoke.

I still think that situation was unique and that
your generalized loser analogy as an explanation
doesn't necessarily wash. There's just something fundamentally wrong about Gore...........
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext