SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Neocon's Seminar Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (987)6/16/2004 9:55:21 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) of 1112
 
Good questions raised.

I would say that the ships could not be identical, for the simple reason that they occupy different positions in space. That makes them similar. With a single object, there is identity when the difference produced is regarded as not substantial. If it is regarded as substantial, then there is continuity, but not identity. An object that seems identical in the short term may, when regarded in a longer time frame, be regarded as merely continuous, because change is gradual but substantial. In the event that there is a reconstruction, for example, an historic building burns but is replaced, it can only claim similarity. When there is no similarity, identity, or continuity, there is destruction.

In the case of human beings, the claim to identity rests primarily on the idea of experience belonging to one actor. In a sense, people change substantially over time, but in another sense, they remain the subjects of their accumulated history, which is why there may be unresolved issues from childhood still haunting persons of substantial age.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext