SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Digital Photography
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas Mercer-Hursh who wrote (8023)6/20/2004 4:59:28 PM
From: Bill Ulrich  Read Replies (1) of 21647
 
Left "as is", the images would get reduced down to around 2" x 1.6" in layout software. They could be stretched after the import but the image quality would be reduced below even a "lo-rez" standard. Abysmal-rez, I think. Upsampling isn't going to be pretty either, but they'd retain a look closer to the on-screen funkiness inherent in the Eyemodule, just in a print size that's a little more usable. That's my theory, at least. <g>

Of course, he doesn't have to use paper. Book distributed on DVD-ROM perhaps, or even PDF. Lots of non-traditional options in the 21st century.

"Upsampling would rather blow the 640x480 concept, wouldn't it?"
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News