Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 36.26

+0.3%

1:32 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: rkral who wrote (178361)	6/23/2004 3:39:35 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) of 186894

For one thing, I found out recently about an issue I was wondering on for awhile.... ESPPs. These are managed with the use of options apparently, which is why the AEA opions about loss of options when expensing comes down will also effect ESPPs. When Bryant or whoever lays out options exercises vs. share buybacks, you are including the ESPP portion of options, no? So using the typical expensing argument, the ESPP options expense should be counted as someone's compensation I assume. Pretty lame, because there are obvious advantages to the company when you entice employees into buying stock this way, and its even harder to justify ESPP discounts as compensation vs. traditional options. I don't think congress is going to go for removal of ESPP plans, no matter what argument is generated on the part of FASB. We know that ESPPs are on the chopping block, microsoft has already cut back on theirs after deciding to expense. I don't think options will ever be expensed actually. There is just too much of a far reaching change to the way US companies operate to dump it all for an accounting rule.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next