Matt:
I'm sorry, but I really have to comment on your post:
Where do you get this stuff?
As nice as it would be if TPII were (back) at $1 by September, the fact is this: TPII's stock price will not go up due to TPII "team(ing) up with some major players in the Y2K, Migration and Groupware arena." The only way TPII's stock price will rise is if the company signs some major contracts and TPII informs the investment community of their financial successes. And so far, the problem to date is that TPII has done neither of these two things to the extent that the investment community has taken notice.
In addition, as you have already stated, "we do not have a 'believable' idea of what type of 'profit' TPI will make." Correct, and as a result, who is going to invest in this company? (Outside of the dwindling few on this thread and Pinetree; a company that in the end only purchased 10% of the shares TPII alluded they would purchase).
And finally, why should anyone "bear with them as they continue to make decisions that (you are assuming) will bear fruit for all of their shareholders." If I can hazard a guess, I would say that TPII decisions, to date, haven't bore much fruit for any of their shareholders. (In fact, I'm pretty sure that the majority of shareholders on this thread holding TPII stock are in the red right now, correct?)
So why should anyone wait on a company that has little track record, hasn't released any financials and has a pathetic investor relations/p.r. consultant?
Y2K - Migration - Groupware; these are just symbols, Matt, and they don't mean a damn thing if no one (and especially those in the investment community) believes TPII is able to deliver.
"(W)e should trust them and continue to hold onto our shares..."
Wrong! We should not trust them; they should prove to us that they are worthy of our money. Plain and simple.
regards,
JS |
