SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 36.20+0.1%Dec 26 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: rkral who wrote (178391)6/24/2004 2:13:01 PM
From: Elmer Phud  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Ron -

Yes, split adjusting some numbers is a little more work than espousing a theory.

Nice job of cutting off my sentence to suit your needs. The rest of the sentence reads: "and we have no way of really knowing what options were exercised in which year."

With options vesting after 5 years and having another 5 years of lifetime, can you tell me which options exercised in any given year were 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 years old? Can you tell me which of these had split 1,2 or 3 times?

Au contrair! Your theory is still pure conjecture, as I said a few posts ago. Pick up the argument again sometime .. when you've got some numbers to support it.

The burden is not mine. Your opinion is that LIFO is the only way to judge impact on shareholders but that doesn't have to be so. I guess it just looks right to you so you think it stands unless someone goes to lengths to disprove it with detailed data. Too much trouble for me with no ROI. My only point was to show that FIFO is a reasonable alternative and I've done that. The fact that you're not convinced that the data proves it is of far more concern to you than it is to me. It is plausible and I see no data to disprove it. Probably not worth the trouble to you to dig it up either. I don't have to prove my point. I only need to show your's isn't the only way to look at things.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext