SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (51635)6/26/2004 1:56:57 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) of 793964
 
Everybody is on this so much I think the "Times" will have to respond.

Mickey Kaus

If the New York Times "was provided ... several weeks ago" with that interesting document describing Saddam's Iraq seeking contact with bin Laden--and Iraq subsequently agreeing with Al Qaeda to rebroadcast anti-Saudi propganda--shouldn't the paper have a) told us about it last week when it was hyping the 9-11 Commission as having reported "No Qaeda-Iraq Tie;" and b) somehow gotten the word to Gail Collins' editorialists before they wrote their self-righteous bit proclaiming "there was never any evidence of a link between Iraq and Al Qaeda"?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News