Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (51805)	6/27/2004 8:04:47 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (2) of 793625

Did he provide a good explanation of how marriage is essential for that? I'll bet he didn't. Because it isn't. He said that marriage was essential in making sure that the men and women stayed together. That out of wedlock children had multiple times higher single parent situations. Therefore we should do everything possible to encourage marriage, and discourage out of wedlock births. His view was that opening up the Marriage vows to multiple relationships was a step on the road to ruin. That the increase in out of wedlock and single parent situations in Norway and Sweden prove it. His answer to the "marriage is broken anyway" argument is that cars kill a lot of people, but we don't get rid of them, we make them better. He comes at it from the "what is the best way to protect the raising of children in our society?" He is very smart to keep it off a "Christian" situation.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next