Research Frontiers Inc. - Moderated (REFR) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Research Frontiers Inc. - Moderated (REFR)

REFR 2.020

-14.4%

9:30 AM EDT

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (28)	6/28/2004 3:48:44 PM
From: 613	Read Replies (1) of 46

1. re: scam/fraudulent. As long as you don't keep yelling it without other facts, it's ok to me. As you see, you aren't barred from this board. I'm not looking to squeltch dissenting views. Only to keep the noise from drowning out the real conversation. 2. >>The problem here is that small investors are given the impression that Inspectech, (the now defunct) and Research Frontiers/SPDi are separate entities. The one and ONLY reason Inspectech is a so-called licensee is because the wife of Alex Martinez (who is an Inspectech executive), is the daughter of an SPDi insider and crony of Robert Saxe. 1. My understanding is that Alex is no longer an Inspec employee. 2. If Inspec is now defunct, this is irrelevant. 3. crony - def: " A longtime close friend or companion." So what? Most (certainly much) business is done with friends. >>I am not 99%... but 100% certain that Alex Martinez, his wife and certain SPDi insiders traded REFR stock immediately before certain press releases (remember 5,000 windows per month). I am 100% certain about this because I went to the trouble and expense of hiring an attorney specializing in securities law and a private investigator to do A LOT of digging. If there is illegality in trading before a PR, I'm perfectly fine with the SEC throwing the offender in jail. SPD/REFR will not be made or broken on Martinez. Have you forwarded this info to the SEC? Will any of this stop SPD technology from being further developed? Do you not think that it works as described? Do you know of any technical problems that will make it unmarketable? I've said all along that I believe SPD will be successful based on the technology and what I think there will be for demand. Though if all of management went to jail, I'm not sure what happens to the license. But since they haven't yet, I think it is unlikely. The SEC certainly knows about the company.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next