SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 36.20+0.1%Dec 26 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer Phud who wrote (178442)6/29/2004 12:15:05 AM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
"For you to leap to conclusions just shows your lack of understanding about the manufacturing process."

WTF? Who leaps to conclusions here? Who "concluded"
the the recall issue is about improper removal of
passivation layer? Who specifically assured the thread
that this is about passivation? As "easy" as that?
Who assured the thread that it is a pad problem? Me?
Who assured the thread that it is so simple that it
it can be fixed and screened at test, while you perfectly
know that all parts were already screened, always, and
apparently no problem was found at the time?

As anyone can see, it is you who jumped to conclusions
and offered your completely idiotic, incompetent
"explanation". The only conclusion that can be derived
here is that either you made a deliberately misleading
post to reassure investors and pump the stock, or you
have no clue about these issues at all. My personal
conclusion that both variants are true.

- Ali
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News