Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Joe NYC who wrote (192241)	6/29/2004 5:34:08 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (2) of 1577024

Yes, interesting. It's a shame that it is wrong. First of all - political affiliation is not a genetically transmissable trait. Even when you look at upbringing, there are various different factors that affect a vote, so it is not possible to scientifically defend the assertion Second - The data shows no decrease in democrat votes. About thirty years passed since Roe vs Wade. Here is the data on every presidential election since then: users.metro2000.net The 1972 election, a year before the legalization of abortion in the US, shows: 1972: Dem. 38%, Rep: 61% Adding 18 years to 1973, the first generation of this alleged decrease in Democratic-voting population comes to voting age in 1991. What happens in the elections since that date? 1992: Dem. 44.9 mn, Rep: 39.1 mn votes 1996: Dem. 49%, Rep: 41% 2000: Dem: 48.4%, Rep: 47.9% (Ralph Nader: 2.7% - with the votes of "people likely to vote Democratic")

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next