SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: one_less who wrote (80825)6/29/2004 12:47:25 PM
From: Solon  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
"And I am telling you to stick that idea UP YOUR ASS. ... we will FORCIBLY stick it up your ass. Your "conscience" might tell you that sex with a ten year old is ok."

Here is the entire quote:

Message 20231592

"I am declaring to you that you nor the government has the right or the power to force me to serve someone or do anything to another person in a way that violates my conscience"

"And I am telling you to stick that idea UP YOUR ASS. When what you do violates our collective consciences as expressed in our laws and regulations we will FORCIBLY stick it up your ass. Your "conscience" might tell you that sex with a ten year old is ok. Hell...you may even be able to justify your conscience by quoting from a book. But you are not the Pope so your private thoughts do not rule society."

This is not accusing you of evil thoughts. This refers to your statement that the Government has no right or power over you when it comes to your conscience. You know full well that the example I used was intentionally extreme in order to emphasize the argument.

Here I state that outright, after you started pretending your inability to separate the universal "your" (as in "ones") and the hypothetical "might":

Message 20239785

"You know very well that my example had nothing to do with any personal aspersions against you. It was given to demonstrate the fact that a conscientious belief does not override the will of society to preserve law and order and to protect people from mistreatment"

But before long you come up with this inane comment:

"You're on the edge of having me raping children again, arent you""

And you have kept up this childish behaviour. Once again...NOW PLEASE LISTEN THIS TIME:

I HAVE NO REASON TO BELIEVE THAT YOU THINK SEX WITH A TEN YEAR OLD IS OK. THE EXAMPLE WAS USED IMPERSONALLY IN ORDER TO SHOW HOW RIDICULOUS YOUR STATEMENT WAS WHEN EXTREME INSTANCES WERE PRESENTED.

Look, Jewels. I can use myself...WATCH! I might think that it is ok to sacrifice first-borns to my God in order to bless my life and especially the watermelon crop--but MY beliefs do not rule the beliefs of society. NOW you can drone on and on about how I believe in human sacrifice--LOL!

I could have used "ones" conscience, and in other instances I actually used fictitious names in order to avoid any pretense at misunderstanding. And do you know what, Jewel? I think it IS a pretense. Firstly, I don't believe you are that stupid. And secondly, if you WERE that stupid, it is still not stupid enough to explain the inability to understand what "no personal aspersion" means?

Now I have bolded an entire paragraph for you. Let us see if you will be able to figure it out...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News