SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (138296)6/29/2004 7:43:40 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Don't confuse him/them with facts, Nadine. Why, for heaven's sake, would he have picked, as argument Number One, the presence of WMDs, if he KNEW that as soon as he went into Iraq, it would exposed as a falsehood and damage his credibility? There were many other arugments. Support for terrorism. Continuing flouting of UN resolutions. Failure of sanctions. Humanitarian arguments above all - starving the Iraqis to build palaces. Mass Graves. etc.

So why would Bush deliberately lie, knowing it would come right back to bite him? It just doesn't add up. It makes no sense.

The left is so unhinged that they cannot look as George Bush as a politician, which he plainly is. And they are unhinging the whole Democratic Party.

And facts aside for a minute...it does strike me as pretty funny, in an odd perverse way....that they who believe Bush has no brain, could possibly even conceive of such a plan. The people who think like this have no shame at all. And no sense of Country, nor history.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News