Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 165.13

+1.1%

Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (41366)	6/30/2004 11:02:18 AM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (2) of 196769

Here’s the deal. Its my understanding that Q’s production costs are under $10/chipset (before the markups) which would allow the Q to price it very competitively with any of the GSM stuff if it chose to do so. All indications are that’s the Q intent, and why not. It would be an insanely bad business decision....that's why. 1) TI has a lower cost structure for GSM chipsets than Qualcomm. Their chips wouldnt include a CDMA component so it would require lower processing power. They also have a substantially higher volumes and they have their own fabs (no 10% margin for TSMC). 2) You cant just lower the price on the MSM6300 and keep the rest of the chipset pricing the same. If the MSM6300 was a sub $20 chip, orders for the MSM6100 and the MSM6050 would dry up entirely. ASP's and margins would tumble immediately. Luckily, I trust Qualcomm's management enough to believe that this isnt even remotely on their radar. Slacker

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next